i’m giddy with anticipation

As Heidi and BlogKC point out, the new downtown library opens tomorrow morning at 7:00 a.m. I’m pretty darned excited:

  • Beautiful, historic building
  • Free wireless
  • Opens at 7:00 a.m.
  • Cafe
  • Rooftop terrace
  • 5-minute walk from my apartment

I’ve never lived this close to a library before, much less one as grand as this. I know where I’ll be spending a lot of time this summer. Oh, and this just cements my belief that development in downtown Kansas City is going to explode in the next decade or so. If you can afford to buy a condo, do so now.

how much time off does bush need?

One of the excuses the Bush administration is giving for its failure to address terrorist threats prior to 9/11 is that they had not been in office very long when the attacks took place. “We were there 233 days” before the attacks, Condoleeza Rice has said. And now, as violence escalates in Iraq, our president takes another vacation. From the Washington Post:

This is Bush’s 33rd visit to his ranch since becoming president. He has spent all or part of 233 days on his Texas ranch since taking office, according to a tally by CBS News. Adding his 78 visits to Camp David and his five visits to Kennebunkport, Maine, Bush has spent all or part of 500 days in office at one of his three retreats, or more than 40 percent of his presidency.

To me, 233 days actually sounds like a pretty long period of time, but then I’m not absent from work 40% of the year so I’m willing to admit that my perspective might be skewed. A president is only in office for four years per term, of course, and 233 days is about one-sixth of that total. How much time do you need to get things rolling? Although they might “only” have been in office 233 days, did the Bush campaign not have some kind of plan for dealing with terrorism somewhere in their platform? Did they walk into the White House and say, “Okay, now what?”

In August of 2001, Bush was on a month-long vacation in Texas, and was apparently relaxed and having fun catching up on his reading, working on his golf game, and celebrating his 55th birthday. Rice has said that in response to the intelligence community’s escalating warnings in summer 2001 indicating a terrorist threat, “The president of the United States had us at battle stations.”

As Dana Milbank and Mike Allen of the Washington Post write, “[I]f top officials were at battle stations, there was no sign of it on the surface.”

And let’s be clear about one thing: “President Bush was warned a month before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that the FBI had information that terrorists might be preparing for a hijacking in the United States and might be targeting a building in Lower Manhattan.”

romantic libraries

The latest volume of Romantic Praxis is entitled Romantic Libraries and includes three essays:

The “about” page reads:

This volume seeks to make more visible in Romantic studies not just the ubiquitous bookishness of the period but the role of the physical book in personal and cultural identity-formations. In different ways, all three essays in the volume concentrate on how the public and national role of libaries as institutions of circulation was not only given affective charge but also often unsettled by an individual relationship to books and by the formation of private libraries as personal sites of collection and memory.

open [blog] night

As part of this week’s Literature for Life Week activities, the Undergraduate English Council sponsored an open mic night tonight, which I attended. Folks read their poetry, their fiction, and on the spur of the moment, I decided to read a couple of blog entries: Self indulgent autobiography followed by Who do you love?. It was an interesting experience.

“that dreadful terry eagleton”…

…is apparently a phrase uttered by Prince Charles. An interview with Eagleton was published in the NYT in January, but recently cropped up on C18-L. Conversation has ensued, although not so much about the issues Eagleton raises in the interview.

Eagleton misses the mark when he says that theorists aren’t addressing the “big questions” he wants them to address. On religion, for example, see The Puppet and the Dwarf : The Perverse Core of Christianity, On Belief (Thinking in Action)
, and The Fragile Absolute: Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? by Slavoj Zizek and Acts of Religion, by Jacques Derrida.

Continue reading →