a new random mp3 meme

Everybody, I think, knows about the Friday shuffle: generate a random list of songs from your digital music player, post the first ten.

I’d like to propose something different: enter a word into your computer’s mp3-playing software and see what pops up. If the word is contained in the name of an album, post the artist and album title. If the word is contained in the name of a song, post the artist and song title.

Today’s word is “wish.” Whaddya got? Here are mine:

  1. “Bullet Proof…I Wish I Was,” by Radiohead
  2. “How I Wish,” by Keith Richards
  3. “Wish,” by Alien Ant Farm
  4. “I Wish My Baby Was Born,” by Uncle Tupelo
  5. “Blown a Wish,” by My Bloody Valentine
  6. “I Wished on the Moon,” by Billie Holiday
  7. “A Single Wish,” by This Mortal Coil
  8. “WishFulfillment,” by Sonic Youth
  9. “I Wish I Was the Moon,” by Neko Case
  10. “Wishful Thinking,” by Wilco

I have exactly ten songs with this word in the title. Weird.

The first person to respond with their “wish” songs gets to pick the word for next week.

Aaaaand…go!

this be the verse

I often feel like I have no idea what it means to be a good son. I think you know what I mean. You have parents.

on “text”

I suspect that textual criticism (and theory) is invisible to most casual observers of the scholarship of language and literature. Perhaps trying to get the culture wars going again holds more appeal for some (Hit it again! I swear I heard it whinny!), but from where I sit, the most compelling scholarly work is taking place elsewhere.

Many have argued that emergent digital technologies are refocusing our attention on what “text” is, exactly, and are reinvigorating a centuries-old tradition of study. For example, the Text Analysis Summit is currently taking place at McMaster University (‘herder Tanya is attending). You can follow along on the Text Analysis Developers Alliance blog.

The study of language and literature is quite wide (though admittedly deeper in some places than in others). Why do some insist on paying attention only to those parts that piss them off? Frankly, I think some people just like to get pissed off.

hamlet on the holodeck

The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that a free, online Hamlet variorum is in the works. Commissioned by the Modern Language Association, the variorum was intended for print, but the editors decided to create an electronic version as well, an idea to which the MLA responded with a resounding “Meh.”

If you’re asking, like Ralph Wiggum, “What’s a [variorum]?”, read this.

tanselle takes stock

If you don’t know anything about the field of textual criticism, the Tanselle essay linked below is not a bad place to start. It’s accessible (in that no subscription is required to read this particular journal), and it’s also accessible (in that no great degree of specialized knowledge is needed to understand it).

Tanselle, G. Thomas. “Textual Criticism at the Millennium.” Studies in Bibliography 54 (2001): 2-81.

During the last part of the twentieth century…a focus on texts as social products came to characterize the bulk of the discussion of textual theory, if not editions themselves. For the first time, the majority of writings on textual matters expressed a lack of interest in, and often active disapproval of, approaching texts as the products of individual creators; and it promoted instead the forms of texts that emerged from the social process leading to public distribution, forms that were therefore accessible to readers.

This dramatic shift has produced some benefits, but it has not been an unmixed blessing. Both the turn away from the author and the emphasis on textual instability reflect trends in literary and cultural criticism and thus are evidence of the growing interconnections between fields that for too long had little influence on each other….These welcome developments, however, came at a price. One is that the prose of many textual critics has been infiltrated with the fashionable buzz-words of literary theory and with a style of writing that often substitutes complexity of expression for careful thought. Another is the notion that recognizing the importance of socially produced texts involves rejecting the study of authorial intentions…Still another problem is that the emphasis on documentary texts has led to a considerable amount of unfounded criticism of the activity of critical editing and the “mediation” practiced by scholarly editors…

Three of the recurring themes during [the second half of the 1990s] were

  • the application of textual criticism to nonverbal works,
  • the editorial traditions of non-English-speaking countries,
  • and the role of the computer in editing.

I shall take up each of these before turning to some of the more general studies of textual issues…