“engineer deconstructs literary criticism”

Via Slashdot: “How to Deconstruct Almost Anything–My Postmodern Adventure.”

You know you’re in trouble when even nerds feel safe beating up on you.

Update: More interesting than Morningstar’s piece, to me, is the discussion on Slashdot, linked above. It provides an idea of what a certain class of non-insiders has to say about literary studies. The discussion is not, in my opinion, very well informed.

And check out this response from Steve Ramsay, a professor of English at the University of Georgia who specializes in humanities computing. He started a Slashdot thread back in August of 2002 on peer review in humanities computing. Many of the resonses to that post indicate readers did not really understand what he was getting at, taking the opportunity instead as an excuse to bash the humanities in general.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

9 thoughts on ““engineer deconstructs literary criticism”

  1. Neocon or nut or not either … there is an intriguing narrative pattern at work in the Morningstar piece… a squirmish leads to a conversation with a friend with a foot in the other camp which leads to a book which leads to more research… the components look awfully like the actants of blog world narrative paths: book, friend, public brouhaha. The book could be generalized to artefact (film, painting, object of urban planning, technological device, piece of code). The public brouhaha is of course the measure of chatter (entries, comments, track backs, hyperlinks).
    Question: has anyone done any work on the nature of friendship in networked environments?

  2. It was ranked in the top 3 in Blogdex, and I linked to it in passing, but didn’t really want to comment on the entry at length, but yeah, the meme is everywhere this week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *