From the PBS Newshour site: Investigating 9/11, including RealAudio of Commission Questioning.
From the Washington Post:
- Analysis: “Zeroing In on One Classified Document“
- “Comparing Rice & Clarke“
- Media analyst Howard Kurtz: “Rice Testimony Is Now History“
- Columnist Dan Froomkin: “Where’s the President?“
- “For the 9/11 Families, A Day Without Answers“
The New York Times has a comprehensive section covering the 9/11 panel, including a transcript of the testimony of Condoleezza Rice before 9/11 commission and these two recent pieces:
- “Members of the 9/11 Commission Press Rice on Early Warnings“
- News Analysis: “In Testimony to 9/11 Panel, Rice Sticks to the Script“
The Guardian has a special section on 9/11 that includes this story on Rice’s testimony.
From Slate:
- “Why Rice is a bad national security adviser,” by Fred Kaplan
- “LexiCondi: Decoding Rice’s self-serving testimony,” by William Saletan
- Eric Umansky offers a linked roundup of the news
From Salon:
- “The Artful Dodger“
- “The performer lost in her performance,” by Alan Gilbert
- “How the war in Iraq has damaged the war on terrorism,” by Jessica Stern
And, of course, GoogleNews provides a huge cluster of information.
Reading Alan Gilbert’s essay only deepened my desire never to be appointed to the NSC. (Happily an obscure possibility at best, of course.) I can only imagine the essay my adviser might publish . . . .!
Just caught SNL’s Weekend Update slam of Condoleezza Rice while I was reading your blog. Pretty harsh.