people i know in the news

What a week! Two very smart people appear in high profile news outlets. First, Chuck, whom I’ve been friends with for over a decade, is one of the bloggers mentioned in a Guardian article on academic blogging. Then Seth Silberman, with whom I went to grad school, is quoted in a CNN story. I have a feeling the academic conference on Michael Jackson is going to attract criticism from the usual reactionary quarters (haven’t looked yet). Seth is no stranger to controversy: when he taught a course on sexuality at the University of Maryland, there were those who were up in arms over the use of the film Showgirls in the classroom.

“gimme gimme (angry chicken remix)”

“He was angrier than a Georgia chicken in a bread pan without any dough!”

I was inspired by Michael Berube. This is my GarageBand masterpiece (mp3, 3.8M). It’s composed entirely of loops provided by the software and stitched together by me. Oh, and there are some sampled vocals by… well, you’ll figure it out.

I hereby release this mp3 into the wild with a Creative Commons license. Dump it into your favorite P2P music swapping service. Put it on your mp3 device. Burn it to CD. Tell your friends. Do what you like. If you have GarageBand, too, and you’d like to remix it, send me a self-addressed, stamped CD mailer with a blank CD-R and I’ll mail you the files (which are something like 40M, and right now I don’t have that kind of server space).

sharp panels at asecs 2005, revisited

Here’s an update to my previous post on the two panels sponsored by the Society for the History of Authorship, Reading, and Publishing at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies.
In an essay entitled “Speech-Manuscript-Print,” D. F. McKenzie writes

“…a phrase like ‘the impact of print’–however carefully it is qualified–cannot help but imply a major displacement of writing as a form of record. In the same way, too great a preoccupation with writing and printing (as the technologies of literacy) may lead us to forget the superior virtues of speech. After all, we did not stop speaking when we learned to write, nor writing when we learned to print, nor reading, writing or printing when we entered ‘the electronic age.’ For those who market texts in those forms, some of them may seem mutually exclusive (do we read the book, hear it on tape, or see the film?), but for the speaker, auditor, reader or viewer, the texts tend to work in complementary, not competitive, ways. None surrenders its place entirely; all undergo some adjustment as new forms arrive and new complicities of interest and function emerge” (Making Meaning: ‘Printers of the Mind’ and Other Essays; ed by Peter D. McDonald and Michael F. Suarez, S.J.; U Mass Press, 2002; 238).

Panel 1: “The Fate of Script in an Age of Print”
Chair: George H. Williams, University of Missouri-Kansas City
Panelists:

Giles Bergel (Queen Mary, University of London), “Shifting the boundaries of ‘the shift from script to print’: the case of engraved lettering.”
Katherine Ellison (Emory University), “Tracing the Way of an Eagle in the Ayre: Script and Print in Seventeenth-Century Cryptography Manuals”
Eve Tavor Bannet (The University of Oklahoma), “Printed epistolary manuals and the rescripting of manuscript culture.”

Panel 2: “The Fate of Script in an Age of Print”
Chair: Eleanor F. Shevlin, West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Panelists:

Betty Schellenberg (Simon Fraser University), “Vicarious Reading, Manuscript Culture, and Johnsonís The Rambler”
Rory Wallace (Emily Carr Institute of Art + Design), “Wish You Were Here”
Cheryl Nixon (University of Massachusetts Boston), “Circulating the Law in Manuscript and Print:Ý Chancery Court Cases and Narrative Forms”

gimme gimme

Earlier, I mentioned how easy it was to put a song together using the parts that are included as “sound loops” with Apple’s GarageBand. In other words, you don’t need to know how to play a “real” instrument, in the traditional sense.

For your listening pleasure: “Gimme Gimme” (mp3, 1.4M), which I made completely from prefab parts. (See if you can identify where the loops repeat themselves: drums, guitars, cymbals — each is a separate loop.)

There’s a longer entry in here somewhere about creativity, composition, and working with chunks of information, but I don’t have time to write it now. Hopefully later. The 3X5 cards I’m laying out on my desk as I revise this article remind me of the little round-edged rectangles GarageBand uses to represent the different components of a song. I’m trying to work out some useful parallels. I love reworking these songs. I hate rewriting. I’m hoping to achieve some kind of crossover effect, however.

so, yes, i’m kind of manic

I’m working on a lot of things at one time, and the stress is at just about the right level. Too much stress: bad. Too little stress: arguably bad, too. I think my low-grade mania is the result of this stress. Either that or all the allergy medicine I’m taking. Not even counting the personal stuff, here’s what’s going on:

  • I’ve organized my ASECS panel, so that’s done, but I’m hoping to put another one together, which will be chaired by someone other than me.
  • I found myself a roommate for ASECS so the hotel costs will be half what they would ordinarily be. I need to go ahead and make the reservations just to get that task out of the way (or maybe that’s the allergy medicine talking).
  • For the first time ever, I’ve been invited to give a talk. Actually, two of them.
  • I’ve been asked to submit a paper to a special journal issue on Charles Wesley.
  • I need to get cracking on editing a special issue of another journal on the eighteenth-century English sermon.
  • I considered, then turned down, a request to organize next year’s meeting of MWASECS. I just can’t afford to take that kind of time until after I have tenure.
  • About a half-dozen proposals and/or applications are due in the next two weeks. Stuff I’m excited about. Stuff I don’t want to screw up. Stuff that will take me to England next year and/or buy me a semester or two away from teaching so that I can work on the book.
  • I’m revising an article for a journal. I’m late. That’s okay, right? I mean, turning in a revised article beyond the deadline is not a fatal flaw, is it?
  • I need to finish my book proposal and circulate it among potential publishers.
  • Classes are going well (I’m very happy with both of them), but I have a stack of grading I need to take care of.
  • I have two students doing independent study with me this semester, and I really need to engage with them more actively than I have so far.
  • I’m also involved in the UMKC Honors Program as their first faculty fellow, and that taking a lot of ideas out for a spin to see how they handle. Hopefully I won’t crash.

Here’s what I need from you: What advice do those of you who have had some success at academic grant writing have for me? And are any of you willing to read over something I write and give me your feedback?